A prominent aspect of the “alternative” vogue in Western countries has been enthusiasm for Eastern gurus and other mentors. A number of these entities transpired to exhibit complicating traits, causing disillusionment amongst their followers. Meher Baba was not one of these, his activities dating to an earlier period.
The career of Meher Baba (1894-1969) evidences a clean moral record. He visited the West in the 1930s, and again in the 1950s, thereafter remaining mostly in seclusion until his death. The major criticism levelled at him is that of the avataric claims he made in his later years. The word avatar, signifying divine incarnation, is derived from Hinduism.
Meher Baba (Merwan Sheriar Irani) fits a rather unusual category of “guru,” the reason being that he was not a Hindu but an Irani Zoroastrian. Both his parents were émigrés from Central Iran. The Iranian city of Yazd is a more appropriate geographical point of reference here than Varanasi or Pandharpur. Meher Baba was born in India, at Pune, a British colonial cantonment town. He was not a Parsi, as is sometimes mistakenly assumed. This ethnic complexity has made his career more interesting to me. My attitude is critical of glosses and quite independent of the devotional movement forming in his name.
Pune was formerly known as Poona, then a centre of the British Raj. There, while attending the Deccan College in 1913, young Merwan Irani encountered Hazrat Babajan (d.1931), an aged female saint of Muslim birth who has Sufi associations (see Shepherd, Hazrat Babajan: A Pathan Sufi of Poona, 2014). The interaction changed his life completely.
In general, Meher Baba is not favoured by “new age” adherents, who have been far more enthusiastic about Hindu gurus like Shri Aurobindo, Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, Sathya Sai Baba, and Swami Muktananda. Indeed, the Esalen Institute of California endorsed Aurobindo during the early years of their enterprise, promoting his doctrines to such an extent that these are well known by comparison with teachings of other figures. The Findhorn Foundation favoured Rajneesh and Sathya Sai Baba during the 1980s and 1990s.
Certain developments on Wikipedia are viewed with suspicion, implying collusion (or strong convergence) between a pseudonymous Meher Baba supporter and a militant defender of Sathya Sai Baba. See Wikipedia Anomalies: Arguments (2010). The tendency to hate campaign is a cultic drawback, evident some years ago in the American branch of the Sathya Sai Baba sect. See Internet Terrorist and Meher Baba Movement. The American branch of the Meher Baba following currently has a reputation for flawed reporting and bias against outsiders.
“Though no devotee of Meher Baba and a sharp critic of Meher Baba’s followers, Kevin Shepherd turns a critical eye on [Paul] Brunton’s account, in Meher Baba, an Iranian Liberal, pp. 146-76.” Quotation from Meher Baba’s Early Messages to the West: The 1932-1935 Western Tours, ed. Ward Parks (Myrtle Beach, S.C.: Sheriar Foundation, 2009), p. 223 note 31. The devotee editor evidently approved of my scepticism concerning Brunton, though he failed to perceive that I did not criticise all the followers, as specific statements in Iranian Liberal do confirm. There is no necessity to be a devotee in the pursuit of researching details relevant to factual occurrence.
With regard to Paul Brunton (1898-1981), that British occultist contributed a very unreliable report of Meher Baba in his popular book A Search in Secret India (1934). An obvious discrepancy has struck many readers. Brunton referred to the low and receding forehead of the Irani, which could mean that the British reporter suffered from an optical deficiency. In reality, the cranium of Meher Baba was well proportioned, and also of substantial size in relation to his body. There are other discrepancies in Secret India far less well known.
The Irani mystic was notably averse to the caste system. He refused to sanction that problem, instead championing the cause of Dalits (untouchables). This was a feature of his activity during the 1920s, when he established his first ashram at Meherabad (Arangaon), near Ahmednagar, a city in Maharashtra. The fact is that, after an initial resistance, he eliminated caste at his ashram, not permitting the ranking or dining protocol generally found in other Indian ashrams.
Another feature that tends to distinguish the outlook of Meher Baba from other gurus is his attitude to miracles. Although in some early statements, he seems to have acknowledged the existence of “miracles,” in later years he frequently gave that subject a low rating, also disowning the performance of miracles in his own case. “Many miracles have been attributed to me, but I do not perform miracles; I do not attach importance to miracles” (quoted in Shepherd, Investigating the Sai Baba Movement, 2005, p. 110).
Meher Baba was also strongly critical of tendencies, in other followings, to create an instinct for “miracle” phenomena. In relation to Shirdi Sai Baba (d.1918) and Upasani Maharaj (d.1941), both of whom he personally encountered, he was disapproving of the hagiographical preference of devotees for miraculous events. He had been the disciple of Upasani for several years, commencing in 1915.
In 1925, Meher Baba commenced silence, a discipline which he maintained until his death. He continued to communicate by means of an English alphabet board; many years later, he resorted to a distinctive gesture language. In this manner he dictated numerous messages and discourses, and also two books on spiritual evolution, only one of which was published during his lifetime (in 1955). That contribution is unusual for an eclectic vocabulary employing Sanskrit/Marathi and Persian terms drawn from the Vedantic and Sufi traditions (the Hindu component was not exclusively Vedantic).
Meher Baba was fluent in several languages, including Persian, Gujarati, Marathi, and English. He gained Muslim followers in addition to Zoroastrian and Hindu devotees (also Westerners). He was quite familiar with Sufism; however, he did not identify with that tradition, remaining non-denominational. The intercultural complexion of his teaching is another factor of difference with the Hindu gurus.
Meher Baba’s evolutionism remains distinctive. His exposition incorporates reincarnation, in an unusual format rigorously tracing a sequence of progression through the diverse species-forms until the human stage is reached. His rationale is not in any explicit opposition to Darwinian formulae; however, the metaphysical dimensions are pronounced.
This treatment explains the growth in consciousness attendant upon evolution, a factor generally missing in mystical accounts. Further, there is the advantage of description in terms of impressions (sanskaras), again quite methodically elaborated. Consciousness is composed of impressions; in this light, the reincarnation process is made more explicable. The exposition of Meher Baba differs from more well known versions of transmigration that do not clarify such complexities; certain canonical traditions exhibit discrepancies in terms of, for example, retrograde incarnation from human to animal.
The presentation under discussion differs from traditional Vedanta in the evolutionist criteria supplied. There is also a divergence from canonical Sufism, which does not teach reincarnation. Some Muslims of earlier centuries inclined to versions of transmigration (tanasukh) associated with the Pythagorean heritage.
See further Meher Baba, God Speaks: The Theme of Creation and its Purpose (New York, 1955; second edn, 1973); Meher Baba, Infinite Intelligence (Myrtle Beach, S. C., 2005); Meher Baba, Discourses (7th edn, Myrtle Beach, S.C., 1987); C. B. Purdom, The God-Man: The Life, Journeys and Work of Meher Baba (London, 1964); B. Kalchuri et al, Lord Meher (20 vols, Ashville, North Carolina, 1986-2001); see also Shepherd, Lord Meher Critique (2017), for necessary qualifications; Shepherd, Meher Baba, an Iranian Liberal (Cambridge, 1988), with bibliography; Shepherd, Investigating the Sai Baba Movement, Part Three, “Meher Baba of Ahmednagar” (Dorchester, 2005).
Kevin R. D. Shepherd
August 12th 2010 (modified 2020)
ENTRY no. 29
Copyright © 2020 Kevin R. D. Shepherd. All Rights Reserved.